.

Braintree School Committee Shake-Up Could Mean Kelly Foley Out, Zarrella In

Officials are waiting to see if Kelly Foley will refuse her seat or be sworn in by Jan. 27.

Kelly Ann Foley, who topped the School Committee race during Braintree's , has yet to be sworn in as a member and may refuse her seat, potentially making way for Joe Zarrella to regain a position he lost by less than 100 votes.

Following Foley's absence at the and the first School Committee meeting of the year on Jan. 9, Joseph Powers received a message from her email address stating that she would not be taking office. That statement, however, was not sufficient confirmation of Foley's intent for the town and school system, and Powers sent Foley a certified letter on Friday, Jan. 13 requesting a note and signature in original ink.

If Foley is not sworn-in or has not officially refused her seat by 4:30 p.m. on Jan. 27, Powers said he will invoke both Massachusetts General Law and the Braintree Charter, directing him to verify whether Zarrella (who received the largest number of votes without being elected) remains eligible for the post and then, if so, swearing him in at the committee's Jan. 30 meeting.

Foley could not be reached for comment. She did not respond to emails, and phone calls went directly to a full voice mail box at her law office, which has recently appeared vacant. As of Tuesday morning, Jan. 17, town officials had yet to hear from Foley about her intent to refuse the position beyond the email from the Gmail account attached to her business.

"It was a surprise," Zarrella said in an interview on Friday. He added that he would be willing to serve if Foley ends up not taking her seat. "I'm just grateful to have a second chance."

If Zarrella were appointed at the end of the month, he would serve until the next town election in 2013. He was originally appointed to the School Committee after the 2009 election when he placed fourth but member Sean Powers left the committee to take his newly-elected position as councilor-at-large.

The current situation and how it may play out, Joe Powers said, is "extremely rare." In his nearly 25 years of experience in Braintree's government, he has not seen someone fail to be sworn in for their elected post and refuse the seat.

Both School Committee Chair Shannon Hume and Superintendent Dr. Peter Kurzberg said on Friday that the shake-up will not affect the work of the committee, which is poised to begin going over a school budget proposal for fiscal year 2013.

Dr. Kurzberg said that the system is set up to deal with occasional, unexpected openings on the committee, as with any local elected body. "Should there be a vacancy, we'll try to get it filled as soon as possible," he said.

Hume said she would be glad to have Zarrella back as a member and also expressed disappointment that Foley may not fulfill her role. "She worked hard and she certainly earned it," Hume said.

Marty Barrett January 18, 2012 at 02:27 PM
there is more to this story.. please follow up Joe..
Joseph Markman (Editor) January 18, 2012 at 02:53 PM
Hey Tyler, I'm continuing to look into it and will publish any additional information that I can confirm.
Angela Geso January 18, 2012 at 05:04 PM
Let's hope this gets resolved sooner rather than later. Would love to see Joe Zarrella back on the committee as he does a terrific job and is a strong advocate of special needs. Also, we need to respect the privacy of Ms. Foley and take her decision for what it is and not delve into the whys and wherefores.
Theresa Nott January 19, 2012 at 12:15 AM
The is clearly more to this than meets the eye. either way I am glad the right person for the job - Joe Zarrella - will ultimately get it. However, the voters who supported her deserve an explanation and she needs to resolve ASAP so the business of the town can move forward. Keep on it Joe M!
Marty Barrett January 19, 2012 at 04:22 PM
Agree Theresa Nott.. voters voted her in! she came to my door when she was running. why would she go thru all that and then not get sworn in?? funny that Angela Geso, of all people, would say we need not delve into the whys.. ahhmm, it's a PUBLIC office, that she chose to run for, so doesn't the PUBLIC have a right to know??
Marty Barrett January 19, 2012 at 07:07 PM
as always, thanks for the great work and follow up, Joe
Theresa Nott January 19, 2012 at 11:16 PM
Of course the public has a right to know especially those who volunteered for, dnated money to or vted for her campaign. If it is pesonal then at least say that but to send something like that in an email to begin with and then not return calls etc... - is very unprofessional for an elected official and even more so from an attorney. Very disappointing.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something