Watson Park Splash Pad Appeal and Petition

Watson Park Splash Pad Appeal and Petition

Some of you may be aware that Watson Park is protected under the Wetlands Protection Act as a Riverfront Area, Wetlands, and a flood plain.  My understanding of the Wetlands Protection Act is that it is designed to help prevent unnecessary development within these protected resources.  When the Town of Braintree approved a Splash Pad project last year, I chose to lead an appeal of the project as I feel that this area should be kept free of parking lots, storage sheds, and the concrete water park that the town is proposing.

After nearly a year and a half, the appeal with the MA DEP came to an end a few weeks ago. Unfortunately, the MA DEP also approved this project.  If you were to read the laws under which the project was permitted, you might find it puzzling how the project could be approved.  What it boils down to is a loophole and two subjective words.

First off, any riverfront development requires that the project proposal proves that there are no feasible alternatives.  This is pretty clearly stated and for this specific project the town has many alternative locations that could be pursued.

However, of course, as is probably the case for all laws, there is a loophole.  If an area had been previously developed a redevelopment project may be approved provided that the project "improves existing conditions."  Redevelopment projects may repair existing structures or "reuse" previously developed land.  Here is where I find the words "reuse" and "improve" to be entirely subjective and these are the only reasons why the DEP was able to approve this project as I understand it.

So what is reuse? Anyone I have spoken to tends to agree that building something new on a grass field does not seem to be reuse.  However the DEP has approved this project based upon a grassy and partly brush and wooded area being reused as a concrete water park.

And how exactly does this "improve" existing conditions with respect to protecting these resources?  Well, the town does have to restore another area in the park of equivalent size to achieve an improvement.  Now, if you look at the area being restored, it is a grassy area that is mowed regularly, and if you look at the restoration project - an "upland plant community" will be planted and it will be mowed once a year (to promote seed germination).  So, the net of paving over grass, brush and partly wooded area that borders wetlands and not mowing an area regularly is apparently an improvement with respect to protecting our natural resources.  This seems to be a bit of a stretch to me.

So, if you see a splash pad at Watson Park any time soon be aware that our riverfront has been protected from development by our government because the Town of Braintree has made these "improvements" to "reuse" the little public riverfront property we have in Braintree.

Now, what is particularly frustrating to me is that the Town only had to submit the splash pad project for approval to the DEP.  The day following the DEP's decision to approve the appeal, apparently Mayor Sullivan met with the East Braintree Civic Association to in part discuss the addition of more parking lots to the area.  Unfortunately, I was out of town for work and unable to attend this meeting, but the Mayor apparently pointed out that one of my neighbors speaking out against the project at the meeting was "the only person opposed to the project."  This seems to be the trend, Thomas Whalen claimed to the DEP during the appeal that my wife and I were the only people in the town opposed to the project.

Well, I think they are wrong.  There are a lot of people in the Watson Park neighborhood and all of Braintree that do not want to see a water park and additional parking developed at the park.  Because of this, I am starting a petition.  If you agree that we don't need to pave over the park for a seasonal water park and parking lots please join us in signing the petition.

Please sign the petition here.  And please spread the word.

In addition to preserving our park, you may also consider that:

  • You don't want your children playing in water recirculated in goose poop (Have you been to Watson Park lately?)
  • You don't want your tax dollars maintaining a seasonal water park
  • You want the Petersen Pool money spent on the Petersen Pool at the high school and not parking lots and splash pads.

This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

Andrew Buttaro October 25, 2012 at 11:33 PM
I am sorry you feel that way. I did not intend to be misleading. I did say that the meeting was "in part" about parking, which I still believe it was. I probably should be clearer that I am quoting Mayor Sullivan through my neighbor. Although I think this is understood since I indicated I was out of town for the meeting. I guess whether this quote is truthful comes down to your recollection vs my neighbors. I will choose to believe my neighbor and not Mr. Albus Dumbledore of the Wizarding World of Harry Potter fame.
Andrew Buttaro October 25, 2012 at 11:33 PM
I also do not understand your comment of my neighbor supporting the parking to be true. As I understand it, this neighbor does not want the splash pad or parking in the proposed locations. Personally, I do not care for the idea of a Splash Pad in Braintree, even with my young family. However, I agree with my neighbor that there are other locations that could be considered that seem more sensible, like perhaps the unused and run down Smith Beach parking lot or perhaps the municipal parking lot in Weymouth landing. Both options would not develop the riverfront, would help to clean up areas in Braintree that need improvement, and would save the town the cost of creating new a parking lot. In Weymouth landing, a splash pad might even help turn things around by bringing business to the area. It would make it a great place for an ice cream shop and for restaurants.
Andrew Buttaro October 25, 2012 at 11:34 PM
As to this meeting being scheduled prior to the decision, this is news to me. I have suggested a number of times that communication of these meetings could be improved. To date, I can only find record of a single meeting of the splash pad online - and this was to discuss it's design, not whether residents support the project or to discuss alternative ideas and locations. Many residents I have spoken with have been completely unaware of these meetings and these projects. It would seem that residents should be able sign up for a town email distribution list to receive email notifications to be kept informed of what is going on in the town.
Andrew Buttaro October 25, 2012 at 11:37 PM
I am not certain. To my knowledge, the town did not present the riverwalk as part of this project to the DEP for the appeal.
Marty Barrett October 26, 2012 at 01:00 PM
i think the splash pad is a great idea...


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »